Archer Scaling.ai

Private preview for SPEC PR

Enter the passcode Raine shared to open your demo.

Archer Scaling.ai
For Lisa Spicer · SPEC PR

A coverage agent you can actually run.

On our call you described the coverage research that eats about ten hours a week — filtering below the outlet, by writer and by topic. Rather than tell you it works, here it is. Try it.

Ahead of our audit on July 31.

Your About page says the work is never replaced by a bot — agreed. This clears the manual scanning so your team spends its hours on the story. It ends at a report a person reviews, never an auto-send.

Demo A · try it yourself

Targeted Coverage-Research Agent

RUN IT BELOW · REAL, LIVE COVERAGE
What I heard was that your current tools only filter by media outlet. What you want is coverage on a specific target, Yamaha motorcycles and off-road, out of your curated source list, filtered by the writer and by the topic inside the coverage. You put it at roughly ten hours a week. — my notes from our call, in my words not yours
This is the part your current tool can't do: precision below the outlet. Pick your sources, type what you're chasing, optionally narrow to a writer, and run it.
Your source list
What stays yours: the story and the client judgment. The agent reads and assembles; you decide what the coverage means.
Your tool gives you everything from Cycle News. This gives you every motorcycle story by these writers across your whole list, summarized.
Demo B · try it yourself

Knowledge & Grant-Matching Agent

ASK IT BELOW · GROUNDED IN PUBLIC OAI DATA
What I heard was that you have ten-plus years of agency knowledge you want queryable by an agent, for your own team and for dealers and grant recipients: what grant-funded projects are in their area, and which dealer can support a recipient. — my notes from our call, in my words not yours
So here it is, running. Ask it in plain language. The persona switch changes who is asking, which changes both the framing and what the agent will reveal. Every answer comes back with the public sources it read, and when the record doesn't have something it says so rather than guessing.
Every answer cites a public source Says “not in this corpus” instead of guessing The persona controls what it will reveal Outward answers end at a human-reviewed draft
Who’s asking
It searches the seeded public corpus first, then writes only from what it found. Answers usually land in 5 to 15 seconds.
What stays yours: anything a client sees. Grounded, cited answers only — it never invents a grant or a dealer, and outward answers end at a human-reviewed draft.
How real is it: what you just queried is a real corpus of public Yamaha OAI material, 44 source documents and 24 supporting-partner records captured July 29, 2026, from the wire releases, YamahaOAI.com, Yamaha's dealer locator, trade coverage and recipients' own project pages. Every link goes to a real page you can open. It is not your ten years of internal knowledge. Point the same retrieval at that and it starts answering about your accounts instead of the public grant record, which is where the real leverage is.

A few things to bring, so the 31st is yours, not generic

If you can round these up before we talk, the demos run on your world instead of a stand-in:

  1. The media tool you're on now, and the one thing it can't do that you wish it could.
  2. Your curated source list — even a rough version. (Paste it into the box above to see it filter your own outlets.)
  3. Where the ten years of knowledge actually lives (Drive, Notion, email, a shared drive of decks).
  4. For the grant agent: who the outside users would be — Yamaha dealers, OAI recipients, or both.
  5. Anything in that knowledge that's client-confidential, so it's walled off from the start.